Governance
The Governance section dissects how power operates through elected councils, band offices, bureaucratic boards, and unelected "advisory" committees. It tracks a pattern of hollow leadership and reactive administration across Newfoundland—where transparency is scarce and accountability is diluted through layers of jargon and shifting responsibility. This section explores what happens when civic structures act more like performance stages than systems of democratic representation.
Posted by Holly Revollàn-Huelin on September 29, 2025 — 7 min read
World Energy GH2 was promoted as Newfoundland’s leap into a clean-energy future, but it follows a well-worn cycle. From the cod collapse to Churchill Falls, Muskrat Falls, and offshore oil, megaprojects have been sold as salvation only to leave behind dependency, debt, and distrust. This article shows how WEGH2 repeated the pattern: weak municipal councils, shaped by soft budget constraints, lacked the power to push back; critics were sidelined as silence was branded “acceptance”; and Crown land was locked up before markets cooled. With the hydrogen boom faltering, communities now face the harm stage — stranded land and fading promises. Breaking this cycle will require stronger governance, transparent land use, and space for dissent, or Newfoundland risks adding hydrogen to its long list of hype-to-harm legacies. Read More...
Posted by Holly Revollàn-Huelin on September 29, 2025 — 7 min read
This article examines how treaties and colonial paperwork in Newfoundland and Labrador have long served as tools of leverage for external powers rather than protections for local communities. From imperial agreements to the Churchill Falls contract, Muskrat Falls overruns, and the cod moratorium, paperwork has repeatedly shielded higher authorities while embedding risk and dependency at the local level. Today’s wind-hydrogen projects follow the same trajectory: communities are invited into consultation but left without enforceable leverage. The result is symbolic recognition on paper, but little in the way of material empowerment. Read More...
Posted by Holly Revollàn-Huelin on September 29, 2025 — 7 min read
This article explores how grassroots dissent in Newfoundland is routinely managed through state-sanctioned channels that neutralize its force. Using the Rae Miller petition anecdote as a starting point, it traces a historical pattern of requiring communities to “ask permission” before opposing government or corporate projects. From resettlement programs and Regional Development Associations to contemporary wind energy consultations, petitions and advisory processes act as pressure valves—creating the illusion of representation while ensuring outcomes remain controlled. The suppressed petition is revealed as a symbol of governance that rewards compliance while erasing true resistance. Read More...
Posted by Holly Revollàn-Huelin on September 28, 2025 — 6 min read
This editorial critiques how academic work can turn silence into proof of consent. Using Jessica Hogan’s 2025 study on wind energy acceptance in Newfoundland and the 2022 Local Paradox paper, it shows how survey numbers and governance theory are combined to manufacture legitimacy for development projects. Hogan’s “recognition justice” framework interprets resignation as support, while Local Paradox explains weak governance as incapacity. Together, they provide governments and industry with a toolkit for pushing projects through without genuine community consent. The Bayman’s Paradox counters that silence is not acceptance, but the product of structural dependency and disempowerment. Read More...
Posted by Holly Revollàn-Huelin on September 28, 2025 — 6 min read
This article argues that Newfoundland politics operates on a barter system where natural resources, silence, and access function as currencies of exchange. In a province burdened by soft budget constraints and fiscal fragility, these non-monetary forms of leverage replace cash and policy as the real drivers of political decision-making. By framing silence as a commodity, resources as bargaining chips, and access as controlled capital, the piece explains why resets and megaprojects repeatedly fail while the same exchange system endures. Read More...
Posted by Holly Revollàn-Huelin on September 27, 2025 — 11 min read
Imported Outrage, Local Silence examines how Newfoundland’s local leadership has borrowed scripts from U.S. culture wars and Canadian partisan media, sidelining real community issues. From Roe v. Wade tests to playground graffiti, the piece traces how outrage has been imported wholesale, drowning out substantive debates about governance, land, and energy policy. It highlights how global frameworks like the Paris Accord shape Newfoundland’s future while remaining invisible to many, and how structural weaknesses in municipalities go unaddressed. The essay concludes by questioning whether Newfoundland still has a culture of its own, or only a borrowed one — and calls on leaders to “teach our children well” with truths rooted in this place. Read More...
Posted by Holly Revollàn-Huelin on September 25, 2025 — 7 min read
This article traces how reputations in Newfoundland politics are recycled and scaled beyond local disputes. It follows Tony Cornect’s shift from MHA to FFTNL president, an oral testimony from Garden Hill showing politicians inserting themselves into industry, and the continuity of influence across offices and generations. The piece then reflects on the very meaning of “kingmaker,” introduced to me in 2016 while working at Le Gaboteur. Finally, it connects these local patterns to global ones: Canada’s selective use of UNDRIP, the role of French consulates in Atlantic Canada as external arbiters, and the Canada–Germany hydrogen deal that crowned Newfoundland as Europe’s energy province without local consent. The article argues that, whether in local halls or international boardrooms, kings are appointed — not elected. Read More...
Posted by Holly Revollàn-Huelin on September 25, 2025 — 8 min read
This article examines how Newfoundland’s politics and activism are shaped less by policy and more by gatekeeping. Using the Port au Port water crisis as a stage, it shows how the Environmental Transparency Committee frames legitimacy through process, how Jeff Todd Young’s career has been carefully groomed across Franco-Jeunes, Mi’kmaw Cultural Foundation, and Liberal nomination, how Tony Wakeham’s silence operates as a deliberate strategy, and how Jasen Benwah leverages Indigenous authenticity as a form of power. The piece argues that reputations in Newfoundland are not won at the ballot box but managed by those who decide who is allowed to speak. Read More...
Posted by Holly Revollàn-Huelin on September 24, 2025 — 7 min read
This article argues that Newfoundland is trapped in a cycle of repetition: crises are framed as opportunities for “resets,” but the language, promises, and outcomes are the same every time. From resettlement and Churchill Falls to Muskrat Falls and the “Big Reset,” the province rehearses the same narratives of crisis and rescue rather than building new strategies. Municipal bailouts reinforce this cycle by rewarding dependence, while centralized politics and performative culture keep institutions weak. The result is stagnation — Newfoundland isn’t moving forward but re-performing the past. The piece closes by linking this cycle to political candidates themselves, setting the stage for the upcoming Kingmaker article. Read More...
Posted by Holly Revollàn-Huelin on September 21, 2025 — 5 min read
This article examines how Germany and Britain continue to shape Newfoundland’s energy future through hydrogen agreements, corporate projects, financial markets, and historical precedents. Germany’s hydrogen alliance and EU timelines push Newfoundland into serving European demand, while Britain’s legacy runs from BRINCO and Churchill Falls to London bond markets and oil ventures like BP and Nu Oil. Together, they reveal the local paradox: decisions made abroad, staged consultations at home, and a province locked into global strategies with little real sovereignty. Read More...
Posted by Holly Revollàn-Huelin on September 21, 2025 — 7 min read
This article uncovers how “consultations” in Newfoundland function less as democratic exercises and more as staged performances. Funding streams through ACOA, REDBs, and provincial programs are already aligned with federal agendas, while consultants, dignitaries, and business elites manage the optics. Public surveys and town halls ask not if projects should happen, but how—with dissent delayed or sanitized into minority notes. Petitions stall, reports reframe opposition, and “What We Heard” documents mask predetermined outcomes. The cycle persists because municipalities, underfunded and dependent on external transfers, lack leverage. By exposing this choreography, the piece shows how managed consent substitutes for true debate, leaving communities disempowered under the guise of participation. Read More...
Posted by Holly Revollàn-Huelin on September 4, 2025 — 9 min read
Garden Hill was once promoted as Newfoundland’s next energy frontier — a project that promised jobs, prosperity, and renewal. Instead, it collapsed into rusting tanks and broken promises, leaving behind a scar rather than a legacy. Today, the Environmental Transparency Committee reframes the site as a symbol of heritage and tourism, invoking ancestors and lighthouses to cover decades of failure with the language of pride. This article traces how overlapping interests in Enegi, Investcan, Town of Cape St. George and FFTNL left their mark, how governance capture ensured no accountability, and how even the fence was only repaired once optics demanded it. Garden Hill is not renewal — it is the carousel turning again, with the same interested parties still guiding the ride. Read More...
Posted by Holly Revollàn-Huelin on September 1, 2025 — 6 min read
This article explores how Newfoundland’s weak local governance structure has made it an ideal testing ground for global agendas like the Great Reset and Agenda 2030. Drawing on Van Assche’s “local paradox” concept, it shows how a vacuum of strategic direction enables foreign capital, ESG-driven policies, and top-down transformations to bypass real public accountability. The piece highlights how green colonialism, staged consultation, and technocratic control have redefined development in the province, connecting Newfoundland’s geopolitical vulnerability to broader global patterns of depoliticized governance, simulated consent, and elite-led transitions. Read More...
Posted by Holly Revollàn-Huelin on August 31, 2025 — 9 min read
This article examines the career of consultant Ali Chaisson as a case study in Newfoundland’s recurring cycle of failed megaprojects and governance gaps. From his early shell companies like Cabestan Holdings to roles in Enegi Oil’s Port au Port #1 project, the Bettencourt-linked Investcan Energy, and later pivots through Orion, OPTIONS, and XMi Systems (now Lexa Intelligence), Chaisson exemplifies how consultants survive while projects collapse. The pattern is sustained by Newfoundland’s “soft budget constraints” — a culture of bailouts and weak local governance that enables consultants to outlast the ventures they front. Rather than producing lasting results, Chaisson’s permanence shows how the system rewards continuity over accountability, turning each new initiative into another spin of the carousel. Read More...
Posted by Holly Revollàn-Huelin on August 30, 2025 — 7 min read
Newfoundland keeps cycling back to “the next big project” because of path dependency (how ideas, institutions, goals, and infrastructure lock in repetition) and soft budget constraints (bailouts that reward risk). Muskrat Falls shows the pattern: a 2005 cable promised 2015 power, but delivery came nearly a decade late at double the cost—while dissent like Brad Cabana’s was sidelined. The new Churchill Falls MOU repeats the trap: external leverage, political optics, and deferred accountability, unless governance reforms and hard budget rules break the cycle. Read More...
Posted by Holly Revollàn-Huelin on August 27, 2025 — 7 min read
In Newfoundland, protest often begins as resistance but too often ends in opportunism. From Muskrat Falls to offshore oil to fracking, the loudest voices have turned outrage into political bids, industry appointments, or personal leverage. Figures like Andrew Parsons and Kevin Aylward illustrate how quickly protest visibility can shift into corporate roles, while local archetypes — the ambitious candidate, the elder, the enforcers, the gatekeeper, and the consultant-in-disguise — show how movements fracture into manageable pieces. The result is predictable: credibility is spent, trust erodes, and outside agendas advance. Protest becomes currency, traded for status, reputation, or influence — until even the evidence of resistance begins to vanish. Read More...
Posted by Holly Revollàn-Huelin on August 26, 2025 — 7 min read
In Newfoundland, land is treated less as heritage and more as leverage. Sweeping claims, untested legal structures, curated “documentation,” and a surge of mineral exploration all reveal how governance vacuums are exploited. From the silenced 6(1)/6(2 debate to UNDRIP consent politics, outside agendas thrive on ambiguity. Land becomes currency, heritage becomes narrative, and without transparent governance, decisions about Newfoundland’s future are already being signed elsewhere. Read More...
Posted by Holly Revollàn-Huelin on August 15, 2025 — 7 min read
This piece exposes how “outrage” in Newfoundland’s environmental and political movements is often selective, serving alliances rather than principles. Using examples from Jasen Benwah’s shifting stance on wind projects, UNDRIP land claim gatekeeping, and Darrell Shelley’s opportunistic politics, it shows how ecological harm is condemned or excused depending on who benefits. The article ties these local double standards to global financial agendas like GFANZ, where narrative control matters more than actual environmental impact, and warns that until consistent standards are applied, the land will remain a bargaining chip and truth negotiable. Read More...
Posted by Holly Revollàn-Huelin on August 9, 2025 — 8 min read
This editorial exposes the “Technocracy of the Base” — a governance culture in Newfoundland where councils and committees operate more as administrative layers than as engines of strategy. Drawing on the Local Paradox framework, it shows how weak local capacity, reinforced by social conformity and peer pressure, creates the perfect environment for top-down agendas to flourish. From Muskrat Falls to Paris Agreement-aligned wind and hydrogen projects, decisions are accepted without scrutiny, not out of agreement, but from the ingrained belief that resistance is futile. Breaking the cycle will require more than policy tweaks — it will take cultural change, strategic capacity, and the courage to dissent. Read More...
Posted by Holly Revollàn-Huelin on August 4, 2025 — 15 min read
This first-person exposé unpacks how charm and consultation are used as instruments of control in weak governance environments. Drawing from the author’s lived experience with ARCO (L'Association régionale de la côte Ouest) and FFTNL (Fédération des francophones de Terre-Neuve et du Labrador) in early 2000s Newfoundland, it traces how a routine website contract and a parallel community job offer unraveled into a pattern of manipulation, silence, and erasure. From RCMP-style charm tactics to abrupt contract terminations, the piece reveals how institutional actors—often under the guise of civility—extract credibility while suppressing dissent. With firsthand documentation and academic grounding, the article exposes how consultation becomes performance, and participation becomes permissioned. In places like Newfoundland, where governance structures are hollowed out, charm often replaces consent—and the muzzle comes with a smile. Read More...
Posted by Holly Revollàn-Huelin on August 3, 2025 — 7 min read
A genome-wide cancer study based in Newfoundland labeled participants “unrelated,” despite drawing from a founder-effect population known for deep ancestral ties. This editorial unpacks how Memorial University researchers bypassed consent, ignored relatedness, and turned a genetically unique population into academic capital—while denying locals access, feedback, or ethical oversight. Featuring the rarely discussed Alldrice syndrome, this article confronts data colonialism and the illusion of advocacy in modern genomic science. Read More...
Posted by Holly Revollàn-Huelin on July 25, 2025 — 8 min read
In this opening editorial under the Governance category, we explore how Newfoundland’s municipal structures have been strategically weakened, allowing outside interests to dictate local outcomes without meaningful oversight. Drawing from The Local Paradox in Grand Policy Schemes, the Muskrat Falls debacle, and the author’s own experience with censorship, this piece distinguishes between governance and government—and shows how the rise of the former is not always a step forward. With Orwell’s warnings in mind and federal projects proceeding unchecked, we ask: who really governs Newfoundland now? Read More...
