Tag: Stakeholder Capitalism

This exposé reveals how international geopolitics—specifically Donald Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris Agreement—played a direct role in the collapse of Newfoundland’s wind projects. Yet despite the scale of this influence, key voices within local activist groups actively suppressed the topic. Framed as “too political” or “divisive,” discussions about U.S. climate policy and global decarbonization financing were systematically silenced by moderators like Paul Pike. The article uncovers how tone policing, selective censorship, and the illusion of neutrality created a sanitized narrative—one that hid the project’s vulnerability to global market shifts. By stifling essential context, this strategy not only misinformed the public but shielded federal and corporate interests from scrutiny. The piece ties into broader themes from the Peer Pressure section, emphasizing how global agendas rely on local compliance—and how silence, enforced socially, becomes a tool of strategic misdirection. Read More...

In the third and final installment of The Consultant and the Keepers series, we examine the internal collapse of the Screaming Eagles opposition group and the emotional unraveling that followed. Using the recent all-caps posts by Coreen Tourout as a lens, this piece explores how Newfoundland’s resistance movements often replicate the very dysfunctions they claim to fight. While factions implode and narratives are hijacked, the Kitchen sisters remain focused on the bigger picture—emerging governance frameworks, stakeholder influence, and the quiet restructuring of local authority. This article connects the public meltdowns to deeper systems of control and offers a warning: when chaos becomes the norm, real resistance risks being written out of the story. Read More...

A federally funded academic study led by UPEI’s Dr. Nick Mercer is quietly collecting local narratives in Newfoundland’s Port au Port region— one of the most outspoken communities against Net Zero industrialization. Disguised as grassroots consultation, this project taps into federal SSHRC grants and local activist groups to legitimize future development plans under the banner of "community research." This editorial exposes how story-gathering is being weaponized as policy justification—and how locals, unpaid and unguarded, may be surrendering more than they realize. Read More...