Tag: wind energy

This article examines how the Port au Port wind-to-hydrogen project exemplifies manufactured consent in Newfoundland and Labrador. Drawing on the Local Paradox framework, municipal dependency research, and the legacy of the cod collapse, Churchill Falls, Muskrat Falls, and offshore oil, it shows how structural weakness, historical trauma, and consultation rituals combine to greenwash global agendas as local opportunity. Port au Port is framed not as a community-led vision, but as an echo of elsewhere’s priorities — Berlin’s hydrogen demand, Ottawa’s climate branding, and corporate strategies — imposed on fragile institutions and vulnerable populations. Read More...

This editorial critiques how academic work can turn silence into proof of consent. Using Jessica Hogan’s 2025 study on wind energy acceptance in Newfoundland and the 2022 Local Paradox paper, it shows how survey numbers and governance theory are combined to manufacture legitimacy for development projects. Hogan’s “recognition justice” framework interprets resignation as support, while Local Paradox explains weak governance as incapacity. Together, they provide governments and industry with a toolkit for pushing projects through without genuine community consent. The Bayman’s Paradox counters that silence is not acceptance, but the product of structural dependency and disempowerment. Read More...

Imported Outrage, Local Silence examines how Newfoundland’s local leadership has borrowed scripts from U.S. culture wars and Canadian partisan media, sidelining real community issues. From Roe v. Wade tests to playground graffiti, the piece traces how outrage has been imported wholesale, drowning out substantive debates about governance, land, and energy policy. It highlights how global frameworks like the Paris Accord shape Newfoundland’s future while remaining invisible to many, and how structural weaknesses in municipalities go unaddressed. The essay concludes by questioning whether Newfoundland still has a culture of its own, or only a borrowed one — and calls on leaders to “teach our children well” with truths rooted in this place. Read More...

This article examines how Newfoundland’s supposed “wins” in land and resource politics often amount to optics rather than substance. From Gros Morne’s UNESCO designation and the displacement of families, to federal “custodial management” of the fisheries, to new wind-to-hydrogen megaprojects backed abroad, locals are consistently left with symbolic recognition while real control and economic benefits flow outward. Even at the municipal level, provincial bailouts reinforce dependency rather than autonomy. By tracing these patterns, the piece argues that Newfoundland’s resource governance operates as theatre: protecting appearances while leaving communities with empty hands. Read More...

Newfoundland keeps cycling back to “the next big project” because of path dependency (how ideas, institutions, goals, and infrastructure lock in repetition) and soft budget constraints (bailouts that reward risk). Muskrat Falls shows the pattern: a 2005 cable promised 2015 power, but delivery came nearly a decade late at double the cost—while dissent like Brad Cabana’s was sidelined. The new Churchill Falls MOU repeats the trap: external leverage, political optics, and deferred accountability, unless governance reforms and hard budget rules break the cycle. Read More...