Explore

This article argues that Newfoundland is trapped in a cycle of repetition: crises are framed as opportunities for “resets,” but the language, promises, and outcomes are the same every time. From resettlement and Churchill Falls to Muskrat Falls and the “Big Reset,” the province rehearses the same narratives of crisis and rescue rather than building new strategies. Municipal bailouts reinforce this cycle by rewarding dependence, while centralized politics and performative culture keep institutions weak. The result is stagnation — Newfoundland isn’t moving forward but re-performing the past. The piece closes by linking this cycle to political candidates themselves, setting the stage for the upcoming Kingmaker article. Read More...

This article examines how Newfoundland’s supposed “wins” in land and resource politics often amount to optics rather than substance. From Gros Morne’s UNESCO designation and the displacement of families, to federal “custodial management” of the fisheries, to new wind-to-hydrogen megaprojects backed abroad, locals are consistently left with symbolic recognition while real control and economic benefits flow outward. Even at the municipal level, provincial bailouts reinforce dependency rather than autonomy. By tracing these patterns, the piece argues that Newfoundland’s resource governance operates as theatre: protecting appearances while leaving communities with empty hands. Read More...

This article examines how Germany and Britain continue to shape Newfoundland’s energy future through hydrogen agreements, corporate projects, financial markets, and historical precedents. Germany’s hydrogen alliance and EU timelines push Newfoundland into serving European demand, while Britain’s legacy runs from BRINCO and Churchill Falls to London bond markets and oil ventures like BP and Nu Oil. Together, they reveal the local paradox: decisions made abroad, staged consultations at home, and a province locked into global strategies with little real sovereignty. Read More...

This article uncovers how “consultations” in Newfoundland function less as democratic exercises and more as staged performances. Funding streams through ACOA, REDBs, and provincial programs are already aligned with federal agendas, while consultants, dignitaries, and business elites manage the optics. Public surveys and town halls ask not if projects should happen, but how—with dissent delayed or sanitized into minority notes. Petitions stall, reports reframe opposition, and “What We Heard” documents mask predetermined outcomes. The cycle persists because municipalities, underfunded and dependent on external transfers, lack leverage. By exposing this choreography, the piece shows how managed consent substitutes for true debate, leaving communities disempowered under the guise of participation. Read More...

This article explores how professional status becomes a tool of social control in Newfoundland, where teachers, administrators, and other credentialed actors quietly enforce what can and cannot be said. Rather than overt censorship, it’s posture, tone, and strategic silence that keep dissent contained—until, when that fails, the courtroom is used. The piece also examines the 2025 Education Accord scandal, where fake citations in a government-endorsed roadmap exposed the fragility of credentialed trust. By tracing how truth is filtered through class optics and respectability politics, it reveals the quiet mechanics of soft-authority systems. Read More...